M. Bassok, L. L. Wu, and K. L. Olseth, Judging a book by its cover: Interpretative effects of content on problem-solving transfer, Memory & Cognition, vol.23, pp.354-367, 1995.

M. Bassok, Using content to interpret structure: Effects on analogical transfer, Current Directions in Psychological Science, vol.5, pp.54-58, 1996.

M. Bassok, S. F. Pedigo, and A. T. Oskarsson, Priming addition facts with semantic relations, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, vol.34, pp.343-352, 2008.

I. Blanchette and K. N. Dunbar, How analogies are generated: The roles of structural and superficial similarity, Memory & cognition, vol.28, pp.108-124, 2000.

C. R. Bearman, L. J. Ball, and T. C. Ormerod, The structure and function of spontaneous analogising in domain-based problem solving. Thinking and Reasoning, vol.13, pp.273-94, 2007.

R. Catrambone and K. J. Holyoak, Overcoming contextual limitations on problemsolving transfer, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, vol.15, pp.1147-1156, 1989.

R. Catrambone, The effects of surface and structural feature matches on the access of story analogs, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, vol.28, pp.318-334, 2002.

D. J. Chalmers, R. M. French, and D. R. Hofstadter, High-level perception, representation, and analogy, Journal for Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, vol.4, pp.185-211, 1992.

, Are superficially dissimilar analogs better retrieved than superficially similar disanalogs, p.39

B. T. Christensen and C. D. Schunn, The relationship of analogical distance to analogical function and pre-inventive structure: The case of engineering design, 2007.

, Memory & Cognition, vol.35, pp.29-38

E. Clément and J. Richard, Knowledge domain effects in problem representation: the case of the Tower of Hanoi Isomorphs, Thinking and Reasoning, vol.3, pp.133-157, 1997.

S. B. Day and R. L. Goldstone, Analogical transfer from a simulated physical system, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, vol.37, pp.551-567, 2011.

S. Dekel, B. D. Burns, and M. B. Goldwater, Leaping across the mental canyon: Analogical retrieval across disparate task domains, 2017.

, Proceedings of the 39th annual conference of the cognitive science society, pp.1908-1913

E. S. Dietrich, Analogical insight: Toward unifying categorization and analogy, Cognitive Processing, vol.11, pp.331-345, 2010.

K. N. Dunbar, How scientists think: Online creativity and conceptual change in science, Creative thought: An investigation on conceptual structures and processes, pp.461-493, 1997.

K. N. Dunbar, The analogical paradox: Why analogy is so easy in naturalistic settings yet so difficult in the psychological laboratory, 2001.

. Kokinov, The analogical mind: Perspectives from cognitive science, pp.313-334

K. N. Dunbar and I. Blanchette, The in vivo/in vitro approach to cognition: The case of analogy, Trends in cognitive sciences, vol.5, pp.334-339, 2001.

K. N. Duncker, Whole No. 270. Are superficially dissimilar analogs better retrieved than superficially similar disanalogs, Psychological Monographs, vol.58, p.40, 1945.

Z. Estes and L. L. Jones, Priming via relational similarity: A copper horse is faster when seen through a glass eye, Journal of Memory and Language, vol.55, pp.89-101, 2006.

L. Festinger, A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance, 1957.

D. Gentner, Structure-Mapping: A Theoretical Framework for Analogy, Cognitive Science, vol.7, pp.155-170, 1983.

D. Gentner and J. Colhoun, Analogical processes in human thinking and learning, Towards a theory of thinking, pp.35-48, 2010.

D. Gentner and R. Landers, Analogical reminding: A good match is hard to find, Proceedings of the International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, pp.607-613, 1985.

D. Gentner, J. Loewenstein, and L. Thompson, Learning and transfer: A general role for analogical encoding, Journal of Educational Psychology, vol.95, pp.393-408, 2003.

D. Gentner, J. Loewenstein, L. Thompson, and K. D. Forbus, Reviving inert knowledge: Analogical abstraction supports relational retrieval of past events, Cognitive Science, vol.33, pp.1343-1382, 2009.

D. Gentner and J. Medina, Similarity and the development of rules, Cognition, vol.65, pp.263-297, 1998.

D. Gentner, M. J. Rattermann, and K. D. Forbus, The roles of similarity in transfer: Separating retrievability from inferential soundness, Cognitive Psychology, vol.25, pp.524-575, 1993.

M. L. Gick and K. J. Holyoak, Analogical problem solving, Cognitive Psychology, vol.12, pp.306-355, 1980.

, Are superficially dissimilar analogs better retrieved than superficially similar disanalogs, p.41

M. L. Gick and K. J. Holyoak, Schema induction and analogical transfer, Cognitive Psychology, vol.15, pp.1-38, 1983.

A. E. Green, J. A. Fugelsang, and K. N. Dunbar, Automatic activation of categorical and abstract analogical relations in analogical reasoning, Memory & Cognition, vol.34, pp.1414-1421, 2006.

A. E. Green, J. A. Fugelsang, D. J. Kraemer, and K. N. Dunbar, The micro-category account of analogy, Cognition, vol.106, pp.1004-1016, 2008.

R. L. Goldstone, D. L. Medin, and D. Gentner, Relational similarity and the nonindependence of features in similarity judgments, Cognitive Psychology, vol.23, pp.222-262, 1991.

K. J. Hammond, C. M. Seifert, and K. C. Gray, Functionality in analogical transfer: A hard match is good to find, The Journal of the Learning Sciences, vol.1, pp.111-152, 1991.

J. A. Hampton, Abstraction and context in concept representation, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London: Biological Sciences, vol.358, pp.1251-1259, 2003.

D. Hofstadter and E. Sander, Surfaces and essences: Analogy as the fuel and fire of thinking, 2013.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02113552

K. J. Holyoak and K. Koh, Surface and structural similarity in analogical transfer, Memory & Cognition, vol.15, pp.323-340, 1987.

J. E. Hummel and K. J. Holyoak, Distributed representations of structure: A theory of analogical access and mapping, Psychological Review, vol.104, pp.427-466, 1997.

H. M. Johnson and C. M. Seifert, The role of predictive features in retrieving analogical cases, Journal of Memory and Language, vol.31, pp.648-667, 1992.

L. L. Jones, Z. Estes, and R. L. Marsh, An asymmetric effect of relational integration on recognition memory, The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, vol.61, pp.1169-1176, 2008.

, Are superficially dissimilar analogs better retrieved than superficially similar disanalogs, p.42

M. Keane, On retrieving analogues when solving problems, The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, vol.39, pp.29-41, 1987.

D. R. Kretz and D. C. Krawczyk, Expert analogy use in a naturalistic setting, Frontiers in Psychology, vol.5, p.1333, 2014.

K. Mcrae, R. P. Nedjadrasul, B. Lo, and L. King, Abstract concepts and picture of real-world situations activate one another, Topics in Cognitive Science, pp.1-15, 2018.

L. R. Novick, Analogical transfer, problem similarity, and expertise, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, vol.14, pp.510-520, 1988.

V. Popov, P. Hristova, and R. Anders, The Relational Luring Effect: Retrieval of Relational Information during Associative Recognition, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, vol.5, pp.722-745, 2017.

L. E. Richland, K. J. Holyoak, and J. W. Stigler, Analogy Use In Eighth-Grade Mathematics Classrooms. Cognition and Instruction, vol.22, pp.37-60, 2004.

B. H. Ross, This is like that: The use of earlier problems and the separation of similarity effects, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, vol.13, p.629, 1987.

B. H. Ross, Distinguishing types of superficial similarities: Different effects on the access and use of earlier problems, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning , Memory, and Cognition, vol.15, p.456, 1989.

R. C. Schank, Dynamic memory, 1982.

C. D. Schunn and K. N. Dunbar, Priming, analogy, and awareness in complex reasoning, Memory & Cognition, vol.24, pp.271-284, 1996.

C. M. Seifert, G. Mckoon, R. P. Abelson, and R. Ratcliff, Memory connections between thematically similar episodes, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, vol.12, pp.220-231, 1986.

, Are superficially dissimilar analogs better retrieved than superficially similar disanalogs, p.43

M. Trench and R. A. Minervino, The role of surface similarity in analogical retrieval: Bridging the gap between the naturalistic and the experimental traditions, Cognitive Science, vol.39, pp.1292-1319, 2015.

M. Trench, L. M. Tavernini, and R. L. Goldstone, Promoting spontaneous analogical transfer by idealizing target representations, Proceedings of the 39th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp.1206-1211, 2017.

S. Vosniadou, Analogical reasoning as a mechanism in knowledge acquisition: A developmental perspective, Similarity and analogical reasoning, pp.413-437, 1989.

C. M. Wharton, K. J. Holyoak, P. E. Downing, T. E. Lange, T. D. Wickens et al., Below the surface: Analogical similarity and retrieval competition in reminding, Cognitive Psychology, vol.26, pp.64-101, 1994.

C. M. Wharton, K. J. Holyoak, and T. E. Lange, Remote analogical reminding, 1996.